6.7 C
New York
Friday, December 9, 2022

FCC Seeks Comment on Additional Foreign Government-Sponsored Programming Rules – Wiley Rein

On October 6, 2022, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) released a Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Second NPRM) in which the Commission proposed to amend its rules for the identification of foreign government-sponsored programming in response to the DC Circuit’s partial vacatur of a prior version of the rules.
History of the FCC’s Foreign Government-Sponsored Programming Rules
In April 2021, the FCC adopted a Report and Order that imposed certain obligations on radio and television broadcasters regarding the vetting and identification of foreign government-sponsored programming. The rules, which took effect in March 2022, required broadcasters to take the following steps when leasing airtime to a third party (or “lessee”):
In response to a legal challenge brought by the National Association of Broadcasters, the DC Circuit vacated the requirement that broadcasters independently verify whether parties leasing time on their stations are “foreign governmental entities” by searching two federal sources – the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) database maintained by the Department of Justice, and the FCC’s reports on U.S.-based foreign media outlets.
The Second NPRM includes proposals to address the purported regulatory gap that exists following the DC Circuit ruling.
In particular, the Second NPRM considers the following changes:
Proposal 1: Certification Requirements for Foreign Sponsorship Identification Rules
As a substitute for the vacated independent verification requirement, the FCC is proposing to strengthen the rules for certifications by licensees and lessees alike. Under the Commission’s proposal: 
Licensees that maintain an online public inspection file (OPIF) would be required to upload the required certifications to their public file. Licensees that do not maintain an OPIF would be required to maintain a record of the certifications.
Logistics of Certifications
Scope of Agreements Covered: The FCC assumes that all “leases” falling within the scope of its foreign government-sponsored programming rules constitute Time Brokerage Agreements or Local Marketing Agreements and, thus, must already be contained in station OPIFs.
Timing: The FCC suggests that the licensees should complete and obtain the certifications when the parties either enter or renew lease agreements.
Non-Compliance by Lessees: The Second NPRM contemplates that some lessees may decline to provide certifications in accordance with the Commission’s new requirements. Among other things, it seeks comment on whether the licensee’s own certification is sufficient to demonstrate that the licensee has complied with its obligations under the foreign sponsorship identification requirements. It also seeks comment on the possibility of requiring licensees to notify the Media Bureau about a lessee’s failure to certify and suggests that the FCC might then investigate whether the lessee has violated its own obligations.
Filing Requirements: The Commission tentatively concludes that licensees will need to upload both their own and the lessees’ certifications to the same OPIF subfolder where lease agreements are normally placed within 30 days of the execution or renewal of the lease agreement. It further proposes requiring licensees to retain certifications in their public file for the same amount of time as leases (i.e., for so long as the lease is in effect).
Implementation: The Commission tentatively concludes that these requirements should be adopted on a prospective basis and that licensees with existing lease agreements will be given a six-month grace period to come into compliance with the new rules.
Proposal 2: Standardized Certification Language
In response to concerns about the undue burdens that certification requirements would create for licensees, the FCC is proposing to create standardized certification language for licensees and lessees to use in filings. The Second NPRM contemplates a “plug and play” process where licensees and lessees input information into a form or cut and paste language into a filing.
Proposal 3: Alternative Proposal
The Second NPRM also raises the possibility of requiring licensees, as an alternative to the dual-certification process, to seek or obtain from lessees’ screenshots showing that a lessee’s name does not appear in either the FARA database or the Commission’s U.S.-based foreign media outlet reports. Although the DC Circuit struck down the requirement that licensees themselves check the two federal databases, the FCC, based on questioning at oral argument, asks whether it can instead require licensees to obtain this information from lessees. Given that this proposal was limited to a paragraph in the Second NPRM and not included in the proposed rule, it does not appear to be the Commission’s preferred approach.
Current Compliance Requirements
While the FCC considers the proposals in the Second NPRM, broadcasters are still required to take the following steps whenever they lease airtime to a third party:
These requirements are summarized in greater detail here.
If you have any questions about the new foreign sponsorship identification rules or if you would like to file comments in response to the Second NPRM, please contact any of the authors on this alert or the Wiley attorney handling your station matters.
Wiley is at the forefront of issues related to foreign involvement in U.S. communications businesses through our Telecom, Media & Technology (TMT)International Trade, and National Security Practices, including our twenty-year old FARA Practice.
Jillian Quigley, a Law Clerk at Wiley Rein LLP, contributed to this alert.
By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions, and Cookies Policy.

source

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles